Anhydrovinblastine for the treatment of cancer

ABSTRACT

The present invention is particularly directed to the use of a derivative of vinblastine, 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine (AHVB), which differs from vinblastine in that it possesses a double bond at the 3′,4′ position of the caranthine nucleus rather than the hydroxyl group that is present in the parent structure, as an anti-neoplastic agent in the therapeutic treatment of cancer.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention is related generally to the use of antineoplastic vinca alkaloids as antitumour agents. More particularly, the present invention is related to providing use for a derivative of vinblastine, anhydrovinblastine (hereinafter AHVB), as an antineoplastic agent with improved therapeutic properties, demonstrating a significantly higher maximum w tolerated dose and less toxicity than its parent and related compounds.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Due to a high degree of unpredictability, classic techniques of drug development are inventive. Mostly through a process of elimination, a large number of natural products and synthetic chemical compounds are screened for desired effects, using a series of increasingly complex systems, beginning with simple in vitro cell level assays, progressing to animals and finally human clinical trials. But, due to essential characteristics such as adsorption, distribution and metabolism, the initial in vitro tests that cannot take these features into account could eliminate a powerful drug that does not perform well in such simple systems. The drug could be metabolized to different compounds in animal models than in humans, which may also demonstrate different adsorption or distribution patterns. Or finally, compounds can look very promising all the way through clinical trials, but then demonstrate unpleasant side effects or a high degree of tolerance when used by the human population at large. It is never obvious which compound will continue to look promising as each stage of tests and development are initiated.

Control of tumorous growth has been achieved to a certain degree using oncolytic vinca alkaloids as antitumour agents alone or in combination with other antineoplastic drugs in cancer chemotherapy for more than 20 years. Approximately 30 alkaloids with a wide range of pharmacological activities have been extracted from the Vinca rosea(Catharanthus roseus), commonly known as the periwinkle plant. Of these, only vinleurosine, vinrosidine, vinblastine and vincristine possess significant anti-tumour activity. In particular, vinblastine andvincristine have been used widely as single agents and in combination with outer antineoplastic drugs in cancer chemotherapy. In addition to the naturally occurring alkaloids, some vinca alkaloid analogues have been synthesized by functional transformation or by semisynthetic processes (R. J. Cersosimo, et al., Pharmacotherapy 3:359-274, 1983; P. Mangency, et al., Org. Chem. 44:3765-3768, 1979; R. Maral, et al., Cancer Lett. 22:49-54, 1984).

Chemically, these vinca alkaloids have a dimeric asymmetric structure composed of 2 nuclei linked by a carbon-carbon bond; a dihydroindole nucleus (vindoline), which is the major alkaloid contained in the periwinkle, and the indole nucleus catharanthine (FIG. 1). The structural difference between vincristine and vinblastine exists at the R1 position while vinblastine and vindesine differ with regard to the R2 and R3 substituents.

The mode of action of the antineoplastic vinca alkaloids has yet to be completely understood. However, it has been established that the antitumour activity is directly related to the high binding affinity of these compounds fortubulin, the basic protein subunit of microtubules (R. A. Bender and B. Chabner, In: Chabner (ed) Pharmacol. Princ. of Cancer Treat., Saunders, Phil, Pa., p. 256,1982; W. A. Creasey, In: Hahn (ed) Antibiotica, Vol.2, Springer, Berlin, p.414,1979). The consensus is that these agents arrest cell mitosis at metaphase by preventing tubulin polymerization to form microtubules and by inducing depolymerization (R. J. Owellen and C. A. Hartke, Cancer Res., 36:1499-1504, 1976; R. H. Himes and R. N. Kersey, Cancer Res., 36:3798-3806, 1976; R. S. Camplejohn, Cell Tissue Kinet. 13:327-332, 1980). As such, the vinca alkaloids are cell cycle-specific anti-mitotic agents, or spindle poisons. The binding affinity of the vinca alkaloids to tubulin correlates poorly with the relative ability of vincristine, vinblastine and vindesine to inhibit cell growth (R.S. Camplejohn, supra; P. J. Ferguson and C. E. Cass, Cancer Res.,45:5480-5488, 1985). The major difference in anti-tumour activity between these drugs appears, therefore, to relate to the irretention in tumour tissue (P. Ferguson, supra; J. K. Hortonet al., Biochem. Pharnacol.37:3995-4000, 1988). In a similar vein, the different toxicity profiles of the vinca alkaloids seems related to tissue uptake and retention properties rather than to inherent tubulin binding affinity. For example, studies have demonstrated that vincristine is more potent than vinblastine or vindesine in blocking fast axoplasmic transport in nerve cells (S. Ochs and R. Worth, Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 16:70, 1975; S. Y. Chan et al., J. Neurobiol. 1:251-264, 1980). In addition, it is taken up into nerves 4 times faster than the other drugs (Z. Iqbal and S. Ochs, J. Neurobiol., 11:251-264, 1980) and exhibits an extended terminal elimination phase of plasma clearance, suggesting a more prolonged exposure to vincristine than to the other vinca alkaloids (R. L. Nelson et al., Cancer Treat. Rev., 7:17-24, 1980).

The in vitro and in vivo differences observed between the vinca alkaloids are striking given the subtle chemical alterations displayed by the various agents relative to their large, complex molecular structure. For example, vincristine is very effective in treating human rhabdosarcomas transplanted in nude mice whereas vinblastine is not active in this system (N. Bruchovsky et al., Cancer Res. 25:1232-1238, 1965). This difference is obtained simply as a result of the substitution of an aldehyde group for a methyl group at the R1 position. Further, this chemical substitution leads to a shift in the toxicology profile such that peripheral neuropathy (in the absence of hematological toxicity) is dose limiting in humans for vincristine whereas anemia and leucopenia are typically dose limiting for vinblastine (W. P. Brads, Proc. Int. Vincaalkaloid Symposium, 95-123, 1980; S. S. Legha, Med. Toxicol., 1:421-427, 1986). A particularly interesting therapeutic profile has been observed for anew semisynthetic vinca alkaloid named Navelbine™ (vinorelbine,5′-noranhydroblastine). This compound is less potent than vinblastine and vincristine againstmurine P388 and L1210 leukemiabut is active against cells derived from human lung cancer whereas the other vinca alkaloids are inactive (S. Cros, et al., Seminars in Oncology, 16:15-20, 1989). As well, clinical trials on Navelbine™ support its utility in treating non-small cell lung cancer (A. Depierre et al., Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 14:155-119,1991; A. Yokoyama et al., Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 11:957,1992). The toxicity profile of this agent appears similar to that of vinblastine, where hematological toxicities and not neurological side effects are dose limiting. Vincristine has proved particularly useful as an intravenously administered oncolytic agent in combination with other oncolytic agents for the treatment of various cancers including central nervous-system leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, lymphosarcoma, reticulum-cell sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and Wilma tumor. It is for intravenous use only and the intratecal administration is uniformly fatal. Following single weekly doses, the most common adverse reaction is hair loss; the most troublesome are neuromuscular in origin. When single weekly doses of the drug are employed, the adverse reactions of leukopenia, neuritic pain, constipation, and difficulty in walking can occur. Other adverse reactions that have been reported are abdominal cramps, ataxia, foot drop, weightloss, optic atrophy with blindness, transient cortical blindness, fever, cranial nerve manifestations, parehesia and numbness of the digits, polyaria, dysuria, oral ulceration, headache, vomiting, diarrhea, and intestinal necrosis and/or perforation.

Navelbine™ (vinorelbine tartate) is a novel vinca alkaloid in which the catheranthine unit is the site of structural modification. Its anti-tumour activity is also thought to be due primarily to its ability to interfere with microtubule activity thereby inhibiting mitosis at metaphase through its interaction with tubulin. It is indicated in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer as a single agent or in combination, administered by intravenous route only. Its side effects include phlebitia or extravasion injury as it is a moderate vasicant. Studies on adverse reactions based on use of Navelbine™ as a single agent indicate Granculocytopenia as the major dose-limiting toxicity, although it was generally reversible and not cumulative overtime. Mild to moderate peripheral neutopathy manifested by pareathesia and hypesthesia are the most frequently reported neurologic toxicities, occurring in 10% of patients. Mild to moderate nausea occurs in roughly one-third of patients treated with Navelbine™ with a slightly lesser fraction experiencing constipation, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, and stomatitis.

Compounds exhibiting lessened toxic effects with equal or greater chernotherapeutic activity remain to be achieved. Thus, a need remains for a drug providing improved anti-tumour efficacy for the treatment of cancer.

It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a method of treating cancer which comprises administering to a human patient suffering from cancer and in need of treatment, an amount of AHVB, effective to arrest or significantly slow the progress of the disease.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of using AHVB as an antitumour agent, comprising therapeutic amount of the chemical substance of the present invention to arrest tumorous growth.

The above and various other objects and advantages of the present invention are achieved by administration of a derivative of vinblastine, AHVB. Other objects and advantages will become evident from the following detailed description of the present invention.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention is particularly directed to the use of a derivative of vinblastine, 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine (AHVB), which differs from vinblastine in that it possesses a double bond at the 3′,4′ position of the caranthine nucleus rather than the hydroxyl group that is present in the parent structure, as an antineoplastic agent in the therapeutic treatment of cancer.

One embodiment of the present invention involves the use of 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine, or variants thereof, as an antineoplastic agent in the treatment of cancer.

Another embodiment of the present invention involves the use of 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine as an antineoplastic agent in the treatment of cancer, wherein the concentration of 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine is at significantly higher maximum concentration than therapeutically acceptable concentrations for vincristine or Navelbine™ for use in the treatment of cancer.

Yet another embodiment of the present invention involves the use of3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine as an antineoplastic agent in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Yet a further embodiment of the present invention involves the use of3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine as an antineoplastic agent in the treatment of lung cancer.

TABLES AND FIGURES

Table 1 shows relative cytotoxicity of vincristine, AHVB and Navelbine ™ on tumor cell lines.

Table 2 depicts estimates of subacutely toxic dosages of vincristine sulfate, Navelbine™, and AHVB when administered to healthy male Nb rats as a single, intraperitoneal injection.

Table 3 depicts C-4 solid tumour delay in growth data.

FIG. 1 depicts the chemical structure of some vinca alkaloids.

FIG. 2 depicts comparison of effects of administering a single intraperitoneal injection, at a subacutely toxic dose, of vincristine, Navelbine™ and AHVB to Nb rats bearing single well-developed, subcutaneous Nb2-U17 tumor transplants on average tumor weight and average weight of the rat as a function of time.

FIG. 3 depicts comparison of the effects of administering a single intraperitoneal injection, at a half subacutely toxicdose of vincristine, Navelbine™ and AHVB to Nbrats bearing single well-developed, subcutaneous Nb2-U 17 tumor transplants on average tumor weight and average weight of the rat as a function of time.

FIG. 4 depicts changes in mean animal weight of BDF 1 mice bearing intraperitoneal P388 tumours following i.v. administration of saline, vincristine, Navelbine™ and AHVB.

FIG. 5 depicts an example cytotoxicity curve used to estimate the IC₅₀ of various vica alkaloids.

FIG. 6 depicts P388 anti-tumour activity of selected formulations of vinca alkaloids.

FIG. 7 depicts a dose response curve obtained for AHVB when used to treat BDF1 mice bearing P388 tumours.

FIG. 8 depicts cytotoxicity curves used to estimate the IC₅₀ of AHVB on the cell lines SKOV3 and C-4.

FIG. 9 depicts mean tumour weight in grams over time (30 days period) following administration at days 1,5, and 9, of Navelbine™, bisulphate AHVB, ditartrate AHVB, and control.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

There are many possible derivatives or variations of vinblastine possible. However, there is no certainty, even to those skilled in the area of anti-cancer drug development, that any such derivatives will be as efficacious or even more efficacious than the parent compound. This takes much testing and experimentation.

The term “variants” for purposes of 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine means any chemical structure that is a derivative of 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine achieved through conservative substitution of side groups, yet still exhibits the same or similar antineoplastic properties as 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine.

Characterization of AHVB Anti-tumour Activity In Vitro

Cytotoxicity experiments on AHVB were performed as direct comparisons with vincristine and Navelbine™ in order to assess its inherent antineoplastic profile against a variety of tumour cell types relative to other relevant vinca alkaloids. The cytotoxicity of AHVB was investigated in vitro against a panel of tumour cell lines of varying lineage in order to determine the specificity of its antitumour activity with respect to cell type. The tumour lines studied were P388 lymphocytic leukemia(amurinelymphocytic leukemia), Noble (Nb) rat U17 lymphoma, MCF7 human breast carcinoma, H460 human non-small cell lung carcinoma, K562 human erythrokeukemia and LS 180 human colon carcinoma based on established NCI in vitro new anti-cancer drug cytotoxicity screening protocols.

Standard dose response cytotoxicity assays (R. Mosmass, J. Immunol. Meth.,65:55-64,1983) were utilized to determine the IC50 (drug concentration required to induce 50% inhibition of tumour cell growth) for vincristine, Navelbine™ and AHVB. The results are presented in Table 1. The indicated cell lines were obtained from either the ATCC or NCI tumour repository and were cultured in tissue culture media by standard techniques well known to those skilled in the art, prior to dilution to a defined cell concentration required for the studies in 96 well plates.

A wide range of drug concentrations were exposed to tumour cells growing at log phasein 96-well microtitre plates. Cell concentrations depended on the cell line as well as the length of time to be cultured. Typically, P388 cells were plated at a concentration of 30,000, 2,000 and 750 cells per well for studies lasting 1, 3 and 7 days, respectively. MCF7 cells were plated at a concentration of 7,000 and 1,500 cells per well for studies lasting 3 and 7 days, respectively. H460 cells were plated at a concentration of 2,500 and 1,000 cells per well for studies lasting 3 and 7 days, respectively. K562 cells were plated at a concentration of 1,500 and 10,000 cells per well for studies lasting 1 and 3 days, respectively. LS 180 cells were plated at a concentration of 5,000 and 20,00 cells per well for studies lasting 3 and7 days, respectively. After plating all cell lines were incubated (CO2 incubator at 37° C., 5% CO2) for 24 hours prior to addition of the cytotoxic agent (See Table 1).

TABLE 1 RELATIVE CYTOTOXICITY OF VINCRISTINE, AHVB AND NAVELBINE ™ ON TUMOR CELL LINES EXPO- SURE DRUG IC₅₀ (nM) CELL TIME VIN- NAVEL- LINES TYPE (days) CRISTINE BINE AHVB P388 murine 1 11.0 ± 3.6 20.0 ± 10.0 140.0 ± 53.0 leu- 3 1.0 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.3 15.0 ± 8.7 kemia 7 2.0 2.5 20.0 MCF7 human 1 N.D. N.D. N.D. breast 3 >2500 >2500 >2500 7 2.6 ± 1.6 2.6 ± 1.6 31.3 ± 12.4 H460 human 1 N.D. N.D. N.D. lung 3 3.5 0.3 10.0 7 2.5 >0.5 5.0 K562 human 1 >50.0 >50.0 >50.0 erythro- 3 1.5 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 2.2 18.8 ± 8.8 leu- 7 N.D. N.D. N.D. kemia LS180 human 1 N.D. N.D. N.D. colon 3 >50.0 >50.0 >50.0 7 1.5 0.5 17.5

Subsequently the plates were incubated for the indicated time period. At specified times, cells were washed and subsequently exposed to the dye inclusion marker MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium), which accumulated into viable cells. MTT was added to the cells at a final concentration of 50 μg per well. After a 4 hour incubation, the cells were washed free of media and unreacted MTT, prior to addition of DMSO which was required to solubilize the insoluble formazan precipitate that formed in viable cells. After the sample was mixed through repeated pipetting, the coloured product was measured using a plate reader operating at 570 nm. The absorbance values obtained for cells cultured in the absence of drug was assumed to represent 100% viability. Experiments were repeated to substantiate any differences noted between AHVB and other vinca alkaloids.

Characterization of AHVB Antitumour Activity In Vivo

Evaluation of in vitro cell cytotoxicity was followed by studies regarding the antineoplastic activities of AHVB in three in vivo rodent models. Thus, anti-tumour activity of AHVB was determined using a rat solid tumour model (U17 lymphoma), the murine P388 tumour model (R Noble, et al., Cancer Res., 37:1455-1460, 1977; P. W. Gout et al., Biochem Cell Biol., 64:659-666, 1986), and a H460 SC Tumour mouse model.

The U17 cell line was originally derived from a transplantable malignant lymphoma that arose spontaneously in male Noble rats (British Columbia Cancer Research Centre Joint Animal Breeding Facility with parents obtained from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.). The cell line is prolactin dependent and can readily be cultured in vitro. U17 derived solid tumours are generated by subcutaneous injection (via the trocar method) of a small (2 mm²) piece of tumour tissue obtained from male Noble rat. Tumour tissue used for the implants arose two weeks after injection of 5×10⁶U17 cells (from culture) subcutaneously in the nape of the neck. For assessing the anti-tumour activity of AHVB, tumour bearing animals (2-4 gm tumours) were given a single treatment of drug and tumour size was measured as a function of time following treatment. The anti-tumour activity was assessed at a series of different doses in order to determine the maximum therapeutic dose of AHVB. Comparative studies between vincristine, vinblastine and AHVB were performed. For these studies anti-tumour activity was determined at the maximum therapeutic dose of each drug.

Antitumour studies on mice focussed, in one case, on the P388 leukemia model. This is a standard NCI model for evaluation of new anti-cancer agents and it has been demonstrated to be sensitive to treatment with vinca alkaloids. This is an ascitic tumour model that was generated by intrperitoneal inoculation of 1×10⁶P388 cells (derived from culture, with an original cell line obtained from the NCI tumour repository) in BDF 1 mice (Charles Rivers). One day after tumour cell inoculation, mice were treated with a single intravenous injection of drug. Animal weight was monitored daily and tumour progression was measured as an increase in animal weight and through estimation of survival time. Therapy was described by a decrease in tumour progression and an increase in survival time relative to an untreated control group. Initial studies established the maximum therapeutic dose for AHVB. Subsequently comparative studies with vincristine and Navelbine™ were initiated where animals were treated with each drug at the maximum therapeutic dose.

The Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines were strictly adhered to and all animal protocols employed were approved by the animal Care Committees of UBC and the BCCA. Animals were evaluated twice daily for any signs of stress (tumour or drug related) and if an animal appeared to be suffering (excessive weight loss or gain, lethargy, scruffy coat, etc.) than the animal was terminated.

Identification of Maximum Tolerated Dose of AHVB

Range-finding acute (14 day), singe dose toxicity studies were performed in healthy male Nb rats in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose of vincristine sulfate, Navelbine™ and AHVB when administered as a single, intraperitoneal injection in these rodents (see Table 2) .

TABLE 2 Estimation of subacutely toxic dosages of vincristine sulfate, Navelbine ™, and AHVB when administered to healthy male Nb rats as a single, intraperitoneal injection. Mortality Drug Dose (mg/kg) (surviving rats/injected rats) 1 ml Saline pH 4.3 n/a 3/3 Vincristine sulfate 1.0 0/3 0.7 3/3 0.6 3/3 0.5 3/3 Navelbine ™ 10.0 0/3 (Vinorelbine tartrate) 5.0 0/3 3.0 2/3 2.0 3/3 Anhydrovinblastine 10.0 0/3 5.0 2/3 4.4 0/1 4.0 1/2 3.0 3/3

To this end, healthy non-tumour bearing male Nb rats (weight range 333-399 grams) were divided in groups of 3 animals. Each group was used to test one drug at one dosage. In a group, each animal received one intraperitoneal injection at a particular dose, as indicated in Table 2. The volumes within which the drugs were administered depended on the concentration of the drug solution (in saline) and the weight of the animals, and ranged from 0.1-1.0 ml. Saline was used as a control. The highest dose of each drug which allowed survival of all animals in a group (3 out of 3)was taken as the subacutely toxic dosage for the drug, i.e. 0.7 mg/kg for vincristine, 2.0 mg/kg for Navelbine™ and 3.0 mg/kg for AHVB.

The health of the animals was assessed by daily weight measurements in addition to behavioural indications of stress. Animals continued to be monitored throughout the complete 14 day study period. Animals were euthanized in the event of signs of severe stress or weight loss in excess of 20%. All animals were necropsied at the end of the study period or at the time of premature euthanasia. Once weight loss in excess of 20% or premature animal death was noted at a dose level, the dose was decreased until the weight loss nadir was less than 20% and no premature animal deaths were observed.

Studies in the Rat U17 Lymphoma Model

Cultures of the non-metastatic, pre-TNb2 lymphoma line originally developed at The University of British Columbia and designated Nb2-U17 (Anticancer Research 14:2485-2492, 1994), and are available from the British Columbia Cancer Research Centre. Cells from exponentially growing Nb2-U17 suspension cultures were injected subcutaneously into methoxyfluraneanesthetized, mature male Nbrats (5rats; 310-380 grams; 5×10⁶ cells/rat in 1 ml of culture medium) at the nape of the neck using a 1.5″20-gauge needle. At about 3 weeks, when the tumours reached a size of4-7 cm (length+width), the animals were sacrificed and the tumours used for transplantation as described below.

A tumour from a rat was excised, minced and the tumour tissue was put into trocars (2″, 13 gauge). The tissue samples were implanted subcutaneously in the nape of the neck of methoxyflurane-anesthetized male Nb rats (248-404 grams; 1 trocar per rat). This procedure was repeated 5 times to get a total of 60 tumour-bearing rats to be used for efficacy studies of the 3 drugs.

When the tumours were well established (1.5-2 weeks later), three separate groups of20 rats, as closely matched as possible in terms of both tumour weight and rat weight, were selected for administration of the three test articles (i.e. one group for each test article).

Vincristine was administered to rats weighing 281-384 grams, bearing tumours weighing 6.3-16.3 grams. Navelbine™ was administered to rats weighing 274-389 grms bearing tumours weighing 9.1-23.3 grams. AHVB was administered to rats weighing 303-400 grams, bearing tumours weighing 7.9-25.9 grams. Tumour weights were estimated using the hemi-ellipsoid model (weight in grams=length×depth×π/6 in cm).

The oncolytic effects of each of the three drugs were assessed at a subacutely toxic dose, determined for each drug in preliminary studies using non-tumour-bearing, mature male Nb rats, i.e. 3.0, 2. 0 and 0.7 mg/kg for AHVB, Navelbine™ and vincristine, respectively as illustrated in FIG. 2. In addition, each drug was assessed at 50% and 25% of its subacutely toxic dose. Five tumour-bearing rats were used to evaluate the effect at each dose level. The drugs were administered intraperitoneally as a single bolus in a volume of 0.19-0.31 ml, as indicated by the weight of the animals . To this end, drug preparations were diluted to appropriate concentrations using sparged saline adjusted with acetic acid to pH 4.2. For each drug, a group of 5 control rats received an intraperitoneal injection of the equivalent amount of saline (pH 4.2). The tumour-bearing rats were organized in the following groups:

Group Drug/Saline Dose(mg/kg) 1 saline — 2 AHVB 3.0 3 AHVB 1.5 4 AHVB 0.75 5 saline — 6 Navelbine ™ 2.0 7 Navelbine ™ 1.0 8 Navelbine ™ 0.5 9 saline — 10 vincristine 0.7 11 vincristine 0.35 12 vincristine 0.175

Following administration of the test articles, the animals; weight and tumour size (using calipers) were determined daily until the tumour reached an estimated weight of 35 grams, or started to ulcerate, at which times the animals were sacrificed (by carbon dioxide inhalation) and subjected to necropsy. Animals were also monitored at least daily for signs of stress for the full length of the study. Animals manifesting severe symptoms of stress (rapid weight loss, panting, hunched posture, scruffy coat) were also sacrificed and a necropsy performed.

Anhydrovinblastine Sulfate (3′,4′-dehydrovinblastine) was obtained from the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Investigational Drug Section. Vincristine Sulfate (Sulfate of 22-oxovincaleukoblastine) was obtained from David Bull Laboratories Ltd., Australia. Navelbine™ (vinorelbine tartrate; 3′,4′-didehydro-4′-deoxy-C′-norvincaleukoblastine-d-L-tartrate) was purchased from Burroughs Wellcome Inc., Canada; 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection USP, pH 4.2 was purchased from Baxter.

The methodology involving animals was approved by the BCCA's Institutional Animal Care Committee (IACC) at UBC prior to conducting the studies (Animal Care CertificateNo. A94-1602). During the study the care, housing and use of animals was performed in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines.

The results of the efficacy studies are given in FIGS. 2-3. FIGS. 2-3 present averages of data from 5 or fewer animals.

The effect of administering a single intraperitoneal, subacutely toxic dose of AHVB, Navelbine™ and vincristine on the size of single, well-established Nb2-U17 lymphoma transplants (average weight 10-13 grams) and the weight of the animals, as a function of time are demonstrated in FIG. 2. Whereas the tumours in the control animals continued to increase in size to an average weight of about 40 grams in 6 days, the tumours in the drug-treated animals in each case regressed to essential non-palpability within 5 days of drug administration. After day 10, recurrence of tumours in Navelbine™-and AHVB-treated animals occurred to about the same extent. In contrast, recurrence of tumours was not observed in vincristine-treated animals (not even on day 29). FIG. 2 also shows that the animals lost weight following drug administration. However, most of the weight was regained after about 17 days. As controls for each drug, Nb2-U17 tumour transplant-bearing rats injected with saline were used. For each of the six groups five animals were used. Vincristine sulfate (0.7 mg/kg) was administered in a volume of 0.20-0.23 ml to rats weighing 281-331 grams bearing tumours weighing 7.6-14.2 grams. Navelbine™ (2.0 mg/kg) was administered in a volume of 0.24-0.31 ml to rats weighing 297-389 grams bearing tumours weighing 11.5-13.7 grams. AHVB (3.0 mg/kg) was administered in a volume of 0.20-0.24 ml to rats weighing 314-374 grams bearing tumours weighing 8.2-14.2 grams. Vincristine sulfate controls: saline was administered in a volume of 0.21-0.26 ml to rats weighing 294-370 grams bearing tumours weighing 9.4-14.6 grams. Navelbine™ controls: saline was administered in a volume of 0.25-0.29 ml to rats weighing 310-365 grams bearing tumours weighing 9.5-18.2 grams. AHVB controls: saline was administered in a volume of 0.19-0.25 ml to rats weighing 303-400 grams bearing tumours weighing 7.9-16.6 grams. The efficacies of each drug were determined separately at three different dosages versus a control.

FIG. 3 shows the anti-tumour effects of the three drugs at 50% of their individual maximum tolerated doses. The data show that Navelbine™ was less potent than AHVB which in turn was less potent than vincristine.

Nb2-U17 tumour transplant-bearing rats injected with saline were used as controls. For each of the six groups five animals were used. Vincristine sulfate (0.35 mg/kg) was administered in a volume of 0.23-0.27 ml to rats weighing 327-384 grams bearing tumours weighing 6.4-13.4 grams. Navelbine™ (1.0 mg/kg) was administered in a volume of 0.24-0.28 ml to rats weighing 296-351 grams bearing tumors weighing 9.1-14.1 grams. AHVB (1.5 mg/kg) was administered in a volume of 0.20-0.23 ml to rats weighing 308-359 grams bearing tumors weighing 9.7-19.5 grams. Vincristine sulfate controls: saline was administered in a volume of 0.21-0.26 ml to rats weighing 294-370 grams bearing tumours weighing 9.4-14.6 grams Navelbine™ controls: saline was administered in a volume of 0.25-0.29 ml to rats weighing 310-365 grams bearing tumours weighing 9.5-18.2 grams. AHVB controls: saline was administered in a volume of 0.19-0.25 ml to rats weighing 303-400 grams bearing tumors weighing 7.9-16.6 grams. The efficacies of each drug were determined separately at three different dosages versus a control. In FIG. 3, results of the three drugs at equivalent, i.e. half subacutely toxic, dosages are compared. The controls in FIG. 3 are the same as in FIG. 2.

Studies in the Murine P388 Model

A cytotoxicity curve was generated to estimate the IC₅₀ of vincristine, Navelbine™ and AHVB in the murine P388 cell line (see FIG. 5). In this study, P388 cells derived from an ascitic tumour grown in BDF1 were first separated from red cells employing Ficoll-Paque. Isolated white cells were washed twice then placed in serum containing tissue culture media (1×10₅ cells per ml of RPMI 1640 supplemented with L-glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum) and cultured for 2 hours. All non adherent cells were collected and that cell population was defined as P388 cells and used for cytotoxicity assays 24 hours later. Cytotoxicity assays were performed as described in the section entitled Characterization of AHVB Anti-tumour Activity In Vitro. The drug concentrations used are indicated on the X-axis. Vincristine is represented by the filled circles, Navelbine™ by the filled triangles and AHVB by the filled squares.

The in vivo anti-tumour activity of AHVB was compared to that of vincristine, Navelbine™ in the BDF1-murine P388 model in the procedure as follows. P388 cells were derived from the ascities of previously injected female BDF1 mice (19-21 grams) P388 cells, from the NCI tumour repository were inoculated directly into mice. The cells arrive from NCI frozen in 1 ml aliquots. These samples were thawed rapidly at 37° C. and subsequently injected (within 1 hour) intraperitoneally into two mice, 0.5 ml per mouse. One week (7 days) after inoculation, the tumour cells were harvested by removing peritoneal fluid using a sterile syringe with a 22 gauge needle. The cells, pooled from two animals, were counted using a heamocytometer, diluted (RPMI media) to a concentration of 2×10⁶ cells/ml and 0.5 ml was then re-injected into each of two BDF1 mice. Remaining cells were washed and placed into a DMSO containing media and frozen (in freezer packs that cool at a defined rate). This process was repeated weekly over a2-week period. Cells used for anti-tumour studies were collected from the third passage to the 20th passage. After the 20th passage the cells were no longer used for experimental studies. Newly established cells were derived from the frozen cells prepared as described above.

Groups (five mice per group) of female BDF1 mice (Charles Rivers, Canada) were injected (intraperitoneal) with 10⁶P388 cells (as described above). One day after tumor cell inoculation, the mice were given a bolus intravenous injection of indicated drug via the lateral tail vein. Control groups were injected with saline. Free drug samples were prepared on the day of injection such that the final concentrations were sufficient to deliver the indicated drug dose in a volume of 200 μl. All dilutions were made using 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection USP. The mice were briefly (less than 30sec.) restrained during intravenous injections. Dilation of the vein was achieved by holding the animals under a heat lamp for a period of between five and ten minutes. Following administration of the test articles, animals were weighed daily for fourteen days and monitored for signs of stress twice daily for the first 14 days (once daily on weekends) and once daily for the remainder of the study. Severely distressed animals were terminated by CO₂ asphyxiation and the time of death was recorded to occur on the following day. Although complete dose titrations were completed for each drug, the data shown in FIG. 6 is that obtained after administration of the free drugs at their maximum tolerated dose. This was 3,40 and 40 mg/kg for vincristine, Navelbine™ and AHVB, respectively.

FIG. 4 presents the results of a study demonstrating vinca alkaloid induced weight loss following a single intravenous injection of the indicated drug at the maximum tolerated dose (see FIG. 6). These data were obtained as part of the study detailed in FIG. 6. After treating mice (bearing the P388 tumour) with a single dose of the indicated drug, animals were examined twice daily for the first 14 days (once daily on weekends). Mean body weight was determined daily over this time period and the results are shown in FIG. 4. Weight gain in the control is an indication of tumour progression. Results indicate that AHVB, administered at 40 mg/kg, is the least toxic of the three drugs evaluated.

The dose response curve obtained for AHVB when used to treat BDF1 mice bearing P388 tumoursis presented in FIG. 7. The studies were conducted as described for FIG. 6. The maximum tolerated dose of AHVB (40 mg/kg) as specified in these studies reflects a very acute (within 1 hour) toxic reaction that limits further dose excalatin for i .v. administration of AHVB. This contrasts the more prolonged toxicity observed for Navelbine™ at its maximum tolerated dose and suggests that an ability to circumvent the acute toxicity of AHVB could lead to significant increases in its maximum tolerated dose.

Based on observation of the in vitro drug screen studies, it is surprising that AHVB would perform well as an antineoplastic agent for use in cancer therapy. The in vitro tests indicate that AHVB is consistently 10 to 15foldless active on per molar basis (Table 1 and FIG. 5) than vincristine and Navelbine™. These results suggest that AHVB would not perform well as an anti-tumour agent. However, in an efficacy study, also employing the P388 cell line (see FIG. 6), the anti-tumour activity of AHVB at the maximum tolerated dose (40 mg/kg, single i.v. injection) is significantly better than that observed for vincristine (administered at the maximum tolerated dose of the free drug of 3 mg/kg). Improved anti-tumour activity, in this case, is measured by the number of long term survivors (>60 days). It is important to stress that, for this example, AHVB is approximately 10 times less toxic (on a weight basis) than vincristine. Therefore, 10 times more drug can be given and it is at this dose that improvements were observed in the long term survival of animals with P388 tumours. When compared to Navelbine™, the in vivo results are even more surprising as the maximum tolerated dose of the two drugs in animals bearing P388 tumours are about the same (40 mg/kg).

FIG. 8 shows the cytotoxicity of AVHB on SKOV3 cells and C-4 cells with a3 day incubation. The IC₅₀s for the SKOV3 and C-4 cells were 4.0 μM and 0.02 μM respectively. Both cell lines were obtained from the ATCC and grown using standard growth techniques and medium as described above. The IC₅₀s were determined through standard cytoxicity assays described above, with each well containing approximately 10⁴ cells.

Studies in the H460 SC Tumour Mouse Model

Cultures of H460 Human Lung cells are available from the British Columbia Cancer Research Center. Cells were injected subcutaneously twice into mature male Rag-2 mice (24 mice, 1×10⁶ cells/mouse) using a 26-gauge needle. The H460 cells were suspended in a Hank's Balanced Salt Solution without calcium. Tumour were allowed to form in the mice for 11 days.

When the tumours were well established, four separate groups of mice, were selected for administration of the three test articles (i. e. one group for each test article of AHVB bisulphate, AHVB ditartrate, and Navelbine™) and one control. AHVB bisulphate and ditartrate, and Navelbine™ were solubilized using 5% dextrose saturated with Argon. Both of these articles were at a concentration of 20 mg/ml. Any dose dilutions were made with 5% dextrose.

The articles were administered intravenously on the days 1, 5 and 9, as were controls of 5% dextrose. Body weights and tumour measurements with calipers were taken every day for the first 10 days and then every other day for the remainder of the study.

Following administration of the test articles, the animals; weight and tumour size (using calipers) were determined daily for the first 10 days and then every other day for the remainder of the study. If the tumour size reached 1 gram in weight or the tumour started to ulcerate, the animals were sacrificed (by carbon dioxide inhalation) and subjected to necropsy. Animals were also monitored at least daily for signs of stress for the full length of the study. Animals manifesting severe symptoms of stress (rapid weight loss, panting, hunched posture, scruffy coat) were also sacrificed and a necropsy performed.

Anhydrovinblastine Sulfate (3′,4′-dehydrovinblastine) was obtained from the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Investigational Drug Section. Navelbine™ (vinorelbine tartrate; 3′,4′-didehydro-4′- deoxy-C′-norvincaleukoblastine-di-L-tartrate) was purchased from Glaxo/Burroughs Wellcome Inc., Canada.

The methodology involving animals was approved by the BCCA's Institutional Animal Care Committee (IACC) at UBC prior to conducting the studies (Animal Care Certificate No. A94-1602). During the study the care, housing and use of animals was performed in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines.

The results of the efficacy studies are given in FIG. 9 and present averages of data from 6 or fewer animals. Each mouse in a given article group had two subcutaneous tumours on its back. Each tumour was measured in length and width and the volume of each tumour was calculated by(LXW)²/2. The two tumour volumes were then averaged. The volume averages of all the mice/group were averaged to yield a mean for the single date point appears on the graph in FIG. 9. The calculation was performed each day the tumours were measured. The standard deviation of the mean and the standard error of the mean were calculated with the error bars appearing in the graph in FIG. 9.

Studies in the C-4 (Cervical) Solid Tumour Model

Cultures of C-4 Human Cervical Carcinoma cells are available from the British Columbia Cancer Research Centre. Cells were injected subcutaneously twice into mature male Rag-2mice (24 mice, 1×10⁶ cells/mouse) using a 26-gauge needle. The C-4 cells were suspended in a Hank's Balanced Salt Solution without calcium. Tumours were allowed to form in the mice for 31 days.

When the tumours were well established, four separate groups of mice, were selected for administration of the three test articles (i.e. one group for each test article of AHVB bisulphate, AHVB ditartrate, and Navelbine™) and one control. AHVB bisulphate and ditartrate, and Navelbine™ were solubilized using 5% dextrose saturated with Argon. These articles were administered at doses of 20 mg/Kg I.V. Any dose dilutions were made with 5% dextrose.

The articles were administered intravenously on the days 1, 5 and 9, as were controls of 5% dextrose. Body weights and tumour measurements with calipers were taken regularly over the period of the study of 69 days.

Following administration of the test articles, the animals; weight and tumour size (using calipers) were determined regularly over the period of the study. If the tumour size reached 1 gram in weight or the tumour started to ulcerate, the animals were sacrificed (by carbon dioxide inhalation) and subjected to necropsy. Animals were also monitored at least daily for signs of stress for the full length of the study. Animals manifesting severe symptoms of stress (rapid weight loss, panting, hunched posture, scruffy coat) were also sacrificed and a necropsy performed.

Anhydrovinblastine Sulfate (3′,4′-dehydrovinblastine) was obtained from the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Investigational Drug Section. Navelbine™ (vinorelbine tartrate; 3′,4′-didehydro-4′- deoxy-C′-norvincaleukoblastine-di-L-tartrate) was purchased from Glaxo/Burroughs Wellcome Inc., Canada.

The methodology involving animals was approved by the BCCA's Institutional Animal Care Committee (IACC) at UBC prior to conducting the studies (Animal Care Certificate No. A94-1602). During the study the care, housing and use of animals was performed in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines.

The results of the efficacy studies are given in Table 3 and present averages of data from 6 or fewer animals. Each mouse in a given article group had two subcutaneous tumours on its back. Each tumour was measured in length and width and the volume of each tumour was calculated by (LXW)²/2. The two tumour volumes were then averaged. The volume averages of all the mice/group were averaged to yield a mean for each single date point. The calculation was performed each day the tumours were measured.

Navelbine™ tumours reached their observable ‘growth threshold’ at day41 and continued to grow steadily whereas the AHVB ditartrate reached the threshold on day 55. The tumour treated with AHVB bisuiphate showed negligible tumour growth through day 69. Navelbine™ had an 84% delay in growth in the tumour, AHVB ditartrate had an extended delay of 106%, and AHVB bisulphate exhibited a marked delay in tumour growth of greater than 209%. Tumour growth did not reach the observable growth threshold over 70 days. This data is found in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3 Solid Tumour Delay in Growth Data DOSE INITIAL GROWTH % DELAY IN EX- 20 mg/kg (day) GROWTH PERIMENT IV days 1, 5, 9 TOTAL OF EXPT. (DIG) C-4eff1 Control (Saline) 32  2 Navelbine ™ 59 29  84 AHVB Bisulphate 99 69 209 AHVB Ditartrate 66 36 106

Taken together, the results presented here show that AHVB has significant and unique pharmacological properties in vivo that lead to significant improvements in in vivo antitumor efficacy relative to other vinca alkaloids such as vincristine and Navelbine™. These results are unique and new in that the in vivo activity of AHVB predicted it to be significantly less on the basis of in vitro cytotoxicity studies.

The present invention also provides pharmceutical compositions containing a compounds as disclosed in the claims in combination with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable, inert or physiologically active, diluents or adjuvants. The compounds of the invention can be freeze dried and, if desired, combined with other pharmaceutically acceptable excipients to prepare formulations for administration. These compositions may be presented in any form appropriate for the administration route envisaged. The parenteral and the intravenous route are the preferential routes for administration. 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine may be administered orally, topically, parenterally, by inhalation or spray or rectally in dosage unit formulations containing conventional non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, adjuvants and vehicles. The term parenteral as used herein includes subcutaneous injections, intravenous, intramuscular, intrastemnal injection or infusion techniques. In addition, there is provided a pharmaceutical formulation comprising 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine may be present in association with one or more non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and/or diluents and/or adjuvants and if desired other active ingredients. The pharmaceutical compositions containing 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine may be in a form suitable for oral use, for example, as tablets, troches, lozenges, aqueous or oily suspensions, dispersible powders or granules, emulsion hard or soft capsules, or syrups or elixirs.

Compositions intended of oral use maybe prepared according to any known to the art for the manufacture of pharmaceutical compositions and such compositions may contain one or more agents selected from the group consisting of sweetening agents, flavouring agents, colouring agents and preserving agents in order to provide pharmaceutically elegant and palatable preparations. Tablets contain the active ingredient in admixture with non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable excipients which are suitable for the manufacture of tablets. These excipients may be for example, inert diluents, such as calcium carbonate, sodium carbonate, lactose, calcium phosphate or sodiumphosphate: granulating and disintegrating agents for example, corn starch, or alginic acid: binding agents, for example starch, gelatin or acacia, and lubricating agents, for example magnesium stearate, stearic acid or talc. The tablets may be uncoated or they may be coated by known techniques to delay disintegration and absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and thereby provide a sustained action over a longer period. For example, a time delay material such as glyceryl monosterate or glyceryl distearate may be employed.

Formulations for oral use may also be presented as hard gelatin capsules wherein the active ingredient is mixed with an inert solid diluent, for example, calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate or kaolin, or as soft gelatin capsules wherein the active ingredient is mixed with water or an oil medium, for example peanut oil, liquid paraffin or olive oil.

Aqueous suspensions contain active materials in admixture with excipients suitable for the manufacture of aqueous suspensions. Such excipients are suspending agents, for example sodium carboxymethylcellulose, methyl cellulose, hydropropylmethylcellulose, sodium alginate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, gum tragacanth and gum acacia: dispersing or wetting agents maybe a naturally-occurring phosphatide, for example, lecithin, or condensation products of an alkylene oxide with fatty acids, for example polyoxyethyene stearate, or condensation products of ethylene oxide with long chain aliphatic alcohols, for example hepta-decaethyleneoxycetanol, or condensation products of ethylene oxide with partial esters derived from fatty acids and a hexitol such as polyoxyethylene sorbitol monooleate, or condensation products of ethylene oxide with partial esters derived from fatty acids and hexitol anhydrides, for example polyethylene sorbitan monooleate. The aqueous suspensions may also contain one or more preservatives, for example ethyl, or n-propyl p-hydroxybenzoate, one or more colouring agents, one or more flavouring agents or one or more sweetening agents, such as sucrose or saccharin.

Oily suspensions may be formulated by suspending the active ingredients in a vegetable oil, for example arachis oil, olive oil,sesame oil or coconut oil, or in a mineral oil such as liquid paraffin. The oily suspensions may contain a thickening agent, for example beeswax, bard paraffin or cetyl alcohol. Sweetening agents such as those set forth above, and flavoring agents may be added to provide palatable oral preparations. These compositions maybe preserved by the addition of an anti-oxidant such as ascorbic acid.

Dispersible powders and granules suitable for preparation of an aqueous suspension by the addition of water provide the active ingredient in admixture with a dispersing or wetting agent, suspending agent and one or more preservatives. Suitable dispersing or wetting agents and suspending agents are exemplified by those already mentioned above. Additional excipients, for example sweetening, flavouring and colouring agents, may also be present.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may also be in the form of oil-in-water emulsions. The oils phase may be a vegetable oil, for example olive oil or arachis oil, or a mineral oil, for example liquid paraffin or mixtures of these. Suitable emulsifying agents may be naturally occurring gums, for example gum acaciaorgumtragacanth, naturally-occurring phosphatides, for example soybean, lecithin, and esters or partial esters derived from fatty acids and hexitol, anhydrides, for example sorbitan monoleate, and condensation products of the said partial esters with ethylene oxide, for example polyoxyethylene sorbitan monoleate. The emulsions may also contain sweetening and flavouring agents.

Syrups and elixirs may be formulated with sweetening agents, for example glycerol, propylene glycol, sorbitol or sucrose. Such formulations may also contain a demulcent, a preservative and flavouring and colouring agents. The pharmaceutical compositions maybe in the form of a sterile injectable aqueous or oleaginous suspension. This suspension maybe formulation according to known art using those suitable dispersing or wetting agents and suspending agents which have been mentioned above. The sterile injectable preparation may also be sterile injectable solution or suspension in a non-toxic parentally acceptable diluent or solvent, for example as a solution in 1,3′-butanediol. Among the acceptable vehicles and solvents that may be employed are water, Ringer's solution and isotonic sodium chloride solution. In addition, sterile, fixed oils are conventionally employed as a solvent or suspending medium. For this purpose any bland fixed oil may be employed including synthetic mono- or diglycerides. In addition, fatty acids such as oleic acid find use in the preparation of injectables. 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine may also be administered in the form of suppositories for rectal administration of the drug. These compositions can be prepared by mixing the drug with a suitable non-irritating excipient which is solid at ordinary temperatures but liquid at the rectal temperature and will therefore melt in the rectum to release the drug. Such materials are cocoa butter and polyethylene glycols.

3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine may be administered parenterally in sterile medium. The drug, depending on the vehicle and concentration used, can either be suspended or dissolved in the vehicle. Advantageously, adjuvants such as local anaesthetics, preservatives and buffering agents can be dissolved in the vehicle.

For the compounds of this invention, the dose to be administered, whether a single dose, multiple dose, or a daily dose, will vary with the particular compound being used. Factors to consider when deciding upon a dose regimen include potency of the compound, route of administration, size of the recipient and the nature of the patient's condition.

The dosage to be administered is not subject to defined limits, but in will usually be an effective amount. It will usually be the equivalent, on a molar basis of the pharmacologically active free form produced from a dosage formulation upon the metabolic release of the active free drug to achieve its desired pharmacological and physiological effects.

An oncologist skilled in the art of cancer treatment will be able to ascertain, without undue experimentations, appropriate protocols for effective administration of the compounds of this present invention by referring to the earlier studies of vinblastine and its derivatives. AHVB a derivative of the Vinca Alkaloid Vinblastine has shown significant cytotoxic potential against a panel of human cancer cell lines, and significant activity against the human H460 non-small cell lung carcinoma tumour xenograph in SCID/Rag-2 Mice. In vitro cytotoxicity assays utilizing the MTT cytotoxicity assay with a drug exposure time of 72 hours have shown that AHVB is an active cytotoxic drug with IC₅₀ values ranging from 20-24 nM against the H460 human non-small cell lung carcinoma, C-4 human cervical carcinoma, K562 human leukemia, and the A431 human epidermoid cell lines. AHVB was approximately 10-fold less active than Navelbine™ when tested in vitro against the same cell lines. Surprisingly, however when AHVB was tested in vitro in solid tumour efficacy experiments it was found to be more potent than Navelbine™ . Male SCID/Rag-2 mice were inoculated sc. with H460 cells and after 12 days of tumour growth AHVB and Navelbine™ were delivered i.v. at doses of 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg on days 1, 5, 9. In this model, AHVB caused greater tumour growth inhibition and was less toxic than Navelbine™. These results suggest that AHVB may have desirable pharmacological properties for therapeutic applications.

It is to be understood that the examples described above are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention. It is expected that numerous variants will be obvious to the person skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains, without any departure from the spirit of the present invention. The appended claims, properly construed, form the only limitation upon the scope of the present invention. 

We claim:
 1. A method for the treatment of a solid tumor in a mammal, comprising the step of: administering to said mammal in need thereof, an effective dose of 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein said solid tumor is selected from the group consisting of cervical cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer and colon cancer.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said mammal is a human.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said solid tumor is cervical cancer.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said mammal is a human.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said solid tumor is lung cancer.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said mammal is a human.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein said solid tumor is breast cancer.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein said mammal is a human.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein said solid tumor is colon cancer.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein said mammal is a human.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the concentration of 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine is approximately ten times the therapeutically acceptable concentration for vincristine for use in the treatment of a solid tumor in a mammal.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein said mammal is a human.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein said solid tumor is cervical cancer.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein said mammal is a human.
 15. The method of claim 11, wherein said solid tumor is lung cancer.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein said mammal is a human.
 17. The method of claim 11, wherein said solid tumor is breast cancer.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein said mammal is a human.
 19. The method of claim 11, wherein said solid tumor is colon cancer.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein said mammal is a human.
 21. The method of claim 1, wherein said salt is 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine sulfate, 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine bisulfate or 3′,4′-anhydrovinblastine ditartrate.
 22. The method of claim 21, wherein said mammal is a human.
 23. The method of claim 21, wherein said solid tumor is cervical cancer.
 24. The method of claim 23, wherein said mammal is a human.
 25. The method of claim 21, wherein said solid tumor is lung cancer.
 26. The method of claim 25, wherein said mammal is a human.
 27. The method of claim 21, wherein said solid tumor is breast cancer.
 28. The method of claim 27, wherein said mammal is a human.
 29. The method of claim 21, wherein said solid tumor is colon cancer.
 30. The method of claim 29, wherein said mammal is a human. 